← back to the graveyard
SS-013 Music streaming · Rdio 2015

Rdio — The Streaming Service Critics Adored and Spotify Buried

Lifespan
2010–2015 · 5 yrs
Peak Users
<200K paying subs (est.)
Killed By
Spotify (outspent)
Status
Bankrupt

Summary

Rdio was a beautifully made music-streaming service that almost everyone who used it admired, and on December 22, 2015 it was discontinued because admiration does not pay royalties. Launched on August 3, 2010 by the Skype founders Niklas Zennström and Janus Friis, Rdio married a large licensed catalog to an interface widely judged the best in the category — clean, fast, with social features that let listeners follow each other and see what friends were playing. It reviewed brilliantly. Entertainment Weekly called it the best app and online interface in streaming. For five years it was the connoisseur's choice.

It was also, the whole time, losing the only race that mattered. Spotify launched in Europe a year before Rdio and reached the United States in mid-2011, and from there it simply outspent, out-marketed, and out-grew its more elegant rival on every axis that compounds in a network business. Rdio raised serious money — reported at well over $100 million, against the more than $200 million its backer Janus Friis poured in across its life — and still could not buy the scale that Spotify's marketing, free tier, and partnerships were assembling. By the end, Rdio reportedly had fewer than 200,000 paying subscribers.

The economics were unforgiving. By 2015 Rdio was reportedly spending around $3.5 to $4 million a month, mostly on payroll, against roughly $1.5 million in monthly revenue — losing some $2 million a month with no path to closing the gap. When it filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on November 16, 2015, court documents listed about $188.5 million in secured debt. The company that built the best product in streaming was, by every financial measure, a failure.

The end was a managed transfer rather than a collapse into nothing. Pandora agreed to buy Rdio's technology and intellectual property for $75 million in cash, hiring roughly a hundred of its employees to accelerate Pandora's own subscription ambitions; the deal closed on December 23, 2015, and the Rdio service went dark the day before. Rdio is the catalog's clearest case of a hard truth founders hate to hear: in a market governed by network effects and the deepest war chest, the best product does not always win.

Timeline

2007–2008
The idea
Skype founders Janus Friis and Niklas Zennström, fresh from selling Skype, begin building a licensed, subscription music service.
October 2008
Spotify launches in Europe
Rdio's eventual nemesis reaches the market first, building a head start in users and label relationships.
August 3, 2010
Rdio launches
The service debuts in the United States and Canada with a licensed catalog and a widely praised interface and social layer.
July 2011
Spotify reaches the US
Spotify enters Rdio's home market with heavy marketing, a free tier, and a Facebook integration that drives rapid growth.
2011–2013
Critical darling, commercial laggard
Rdio expands to dozens of countries and wins glowing reviews, but its subscriber growth trails Spotify badly.
2013
The Cumulus deal
Radio group Cumulus takes a reported 15 percent stake at a roughly $500 million valuation, trading advertising for equity.
2014–2015
The bleed
Rdio burns roughly $2 million a month — about $3.5–4M in costs against ~$1.5M in revenue — with subscriber numbers far short of viability.
July 8, 2015
Pandora circles
Pandora submits a preliminary letter of intent to buy Rdio's assets.
November 16, 2015
Chapter 11
Rdio files for bankruptcy, listing about $188.5 million in secured debt, and announces Pandora will buy key assets for $75 million in cash.
December 22, 2015
Service discontinued
The Rdio app and website go dark, ending the five-year-old service.
December 23, 2015
Sale closes
Pandora completes the $75 million acquisition of Rdio's technology and IP and hires roughly 100 of its staff.

The Best App in the Room

Rdio launched into a market that did not yet exist in America. In August 2010 most Americans still bought songs from iTunes or owned them on discs; the idea of renting access to all music for a flat monthly fee was novel, and the legal services that offered it were few and mostly unlovely. Rdio's pitch was that streaming could be not just legal and comprehensive but genuinely pleasurable — and on that promise it delivered with a polish the category had not seen. The app was fast and uncluttered, the playlist tools elegant, and a social layer let you follow other listeners and discover music through people, not algorithms alone.

The pedigree fit the product. Rdio came from Niklas Zennström and Janus Friis, the duo behind Kazaa and then Skype — people who had twice before built software millions adored. Reviewers rewarded the craft; Rdio routinely topped comparisons on design, with outlets like Entertainment Weekly judging it the best app and online experience in streaming. If the category had been decided on quality, Rdio would have won it.

But the thing being sold was not the app. It was access to the same tens of millions of songs every licensed competitor also offered, under the same royalty deals, at the same roughly ten dollars a month. When the underlying product is identical by license, the interface is a tiebreaker, not a moat — and a tiebreaker only matters if the customer is already in the room deciding between you and the other guy. Rdio's tragedy was that most customers never got that far, because by the time they were choosing, the other guy had already been introduced to them, loudly, for years.

The Race Rdio Could Not Win

That other guy was Spotify, and Spotify ran a different race. It had launched in Europe in 2008, two years before Rdio existed, and arrived in the United States in mid-2011 with three weapons Rdio could not match: a free, ad-supported tier that pulled in users who would never start with a paid subscription; an aggressive Facebook integration that turned listening into a viral feed; and a marketing budget and label-relationship machine sized for land-grab, not connoisseurship. In a business where catalogs are interchangeable, the winner is decided by who acquires the most listeners fastest and keeps them — and Spotify was built, and funded, to do exactly that.

Rdio competed the way a smaller, classier challenger does: on quality, on word of mouth, on the loyalty of the people who found it. That is a fine way to build a beloved product and a poor way to win a network-effects market, where every additional user makes the service more valuable to the next and the leader's lead compounds. Rdio raised real money — reported well past $100 million, with Janus Friis alone said to have invested more than $200 million over the company's life — and even took an equity-for-advertising stake from Cumulus at a roughly $500 million valuation in 2013. None of it bought the one thing that mattered: a user base large enough to make the math work.

So the math broke instead. By 2015 Rdio was spending in the neighborhood of $3.5 to $4 million a month, the bulk of it payroll, against roughly $1.5 million in revenue — a loss of about $2 million every month from a service that, the bankruptcy filing conceded, had been unable to achieve profitability despite the investment of several hundred million dollars and years of effort. With fewer than 200,000 paying subscribers reported at the end, Rdio was not a small version of Spotify; it was a beautifully engineered way to lose money, and the runway had run out.

December 22, 2015

The end, when it came, was orderly by the standards of a failure this complete. Rather than simply collapse, Rdio arranged its own succession: Pandora — the internet-radio pioneer that wanted to move into on-demand subscription streaming and lacked the technology to do it quickly — agreed to buy Rdio's technology and intellectual property for $75 million in cash, plus an allowance for employee-transition costs, and to hire roughly a hundred Rdio staff. The deal was structured through bankruptcy: Rdio filed Chapter 11 on November 16, 2015, the court approved the sale, and it closed on December 23.

For users, the practical end came one day earlier. On December 22, 2015 the Rdio service was discontinued; subscribers were pointed toward Pandora and, like every streaming customer, were free to walk to Spotify, Apple Music, or anyone else, carrying nothing but their own taste. Because the product had only ever been access to a shared catalog, there was little personal data of consequence to lose, which made Rdio's death cleaner for its users than for its investors. The people who lost something real were the ones who had funded it.

What Pandora bought was the craft. Rdio's engineering and design — the very things that had won the reviews and lost the market — went on to underpin Pandora's eventual subscription tier, so the best app in streaming did, in a sense, survive as the bones of someone else's service. It is a fittingly understated epitaph: a competitor paid $75 million for Rdio's quality after the business that produced it had failed. The product was never the problem.

The Five Factors

01
In a network-effects market, scale beats craft
Streaming royalties make every catalog roughly the same; the winner is whoever amasses the most listeners, because each one makes the service more valuable to the next. Rdio's superior interface was a tiebreaker in a contest most customers never reached, having already been claimed by the larger network.
02
A first mover with a free tier compounds a lead you cannot out-design
Spotify's two-year European head start, its ad-supported free tier, and its viral Facebook integration assembled users faster than Rdio could attract them on quality alone. Once a competitor's lead is compounding, beating its product is not enough; you have to beat its growth, which is far harder.
03
You cannot out-raise a rival who is also out-raising you
Rdio brought over $100 million and a famous founder's $200 million-plus to the fight and still lost the spending war. Capital only wins if it buys defensible scale faster than the competitor's capital does; against a better-funded land-grab, more money merely funds a longer, more expensive defeat.
04
Identical-cost products compete on distribution, not features
When every player licenses the same songs at the same royalty and charges the same price, differentiation collapses onto who can reach and retain customers. The elegant feature set that critics rewarded did nothing to change the unit economics or the cost of acquiring the next subscriber.
05
Unit economics that never close end in bankruptcy, however good the press
Losing about $2 million a month against fewer than 200,000 subscribers was a structural failure no acclaim could offset. A business that cannot make the math work at its current scale, and cannot reach the scale where it would, is insolvent in slow motion no matter how loved.

Aftermath

Rdio's users scattered with little friction to Spotify, Apple Music, and Pandora's own offerings — the cost of switching a streaming service is, by design, almost nil, which was part of why the market consolidated so brutally. They lost a service they liked and an interface many considered the best around, but no library, no purchase, and no archive; the loss was aesthetic and habitual, not material. Roughly a hundred Rdio employees moved to Pandora, where their work outlived the brand.

The lasting mark is the lesson itself, repeated in founder lore ever since: the best product does not always win. Rdio is the streaming era's cleanest exhibit for it — a service that won nearly every comparison on merit and lost the war on distribution, capital, and timing. Its technology lived on inside Pandora, later absorbed by Sirius XM, while Spotify, the rival that buried it, became the global default. For anyone tempted to believe that building the better thing is sufficient, Rdio remains the polite, well-designed proof that it is not.

Lessons

  1. In a market governed by network effects, prioritize scale and distribution from day one; a superior product is a tiebreaker, not a moat, and only matters to customers you have already reached.
  2. Respect a first mover's compounding lead — especially one with a free tier — because once growth is compounding for a rival, out-designing them is not enough to catch up.
  3. Do not assume capital will save you against a competitor who is also well funded; money only wins when it buys defensible scale faster than the other side's money does.
  4. When your product's underlying cost and offering are identical to rivals', expect to compete on reach and retention, not features, and budget accordingly.
  5. Watch the unit economics above all: a beloved service that loses money at its current scale and cannot reach profitable scale is insolvent on a delay, no matter how strong the reviews.

References